Cargando…

The rationalizing voter /

When citizens think about political leaders, groups and issues, their feelings bias how information is encoded, evaluated and acted upon.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Lodge, Milton
Otros Autores: Taber, Charles S.
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Colección:Cambridge studies in public opinion and political psychology.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • List of Tables; List of Figures; Preface; 1 Unconscious Thinking on Political Judgment, Reasoning, and Behavior; The Ubiquity of Unconscious Thinking; Implicit Cues in the Real World and in the Laboratory; The Stream of Political Information Processing; The Rationalizing Voter; Looking Ahead; 2 The John Q. Public Model of Political Information Processing; The Architecture of Memory; Seven Postulates Drive the Formation and Expression of Political Attitudes; Forewarned Is Forearmed: General Expectations and Anticipated Objections; Looking Ahead.
  • 3 Experimental Tests of Automatic Hot CognitionExperimental Paradigms for the Priming of Affect and Cognition; Experimental Tests of the Automaticity of Affect for Political Leaders, Groups, and Issues; Discussion; 4 Implicit Identifications in Political Information Processing; An Experimental Test of Implicit Identifications; An Experimental Test of the Influence of Racial Stereotypes on Policy Support; General Discussion; 5 Affect Transfer and the Evaluation of Political Candidates; Experimental Tests of Affect Transfer for Political Candidate Evaluations; Study 1; Study 2.
  • General DiscussionAppendix 5.A. Article for Study 1; Appendix 5.B. War Paragraph; 6 Affective Contagion and Political Thinking; Two Experiments on Affective Contagion in Political Reasoning; General Discussion; 7 Motivated Political Reasoning; Experiments on the Mechanisms of Motivated Reasoning; General Discussion; 8 A Computational Model of the Citizen as Motivated Reasoner; A Model of Political Information Processing; Simulating the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation in the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election; Comparisons of JQP with a Bayesian Learning Model.
  • Online, Memory-Based, and Hybrid Models of UpdatingSimulating the Survey Respondents Beliefs about Candidates; General Discussion; 9 Affect, Cognition, Emotion; JQP and the Survey Response; JQP versus Prominent Models of Candidate Evaluation and Vote Choice; JQP and the Rationality of the American Voter; Bibliography; Index.