A Guide to the World Anti-Doping Code : a Fight for the Spirit of Sport.
This guide to the rules which regulate anti-doping in sport includes numerous case studies.
Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
---|---|
Autor principal: | |
Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Cambridge :
Cambridge University Press,
2013.
|
Edición: | 2nd ed. |
Temas: | |
Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Figures; Preface to the second edition; Table of cases; Introduction; Origins of WADA and the Code; Adoption of the Code; The Code and the International Standards; Other methods of regulation; Liaison with State authorities; The challenges for the Code; The need for consistency; Access to decisions under the Code; Outline of the text; The sources of law in relation to the interpretation of the Code; 1 The development of principles relating to anti-doping regimes: the role of the Court of Arbitration for Sport; Background; OMADC; Different approaches; Court challenges.
- International developmentsCriminal law: principles generally inapplicable; Development of common principles; The role of the Court of Arbitration for Sport; CAS Rules; Independence of CAS; Code for sports-related arbitration; Role of the International Council of Arbitration for Sport; CAS composition; Outline of CAS Procedural Rules 2010; General Procedural Rules; Ordinary arbitrations: special provisions; Appointment of arbitrators; Third-party joinder and intervention; Conciliation; Procedure before CAS Panel; Expedition; The arbitration award; Costs.
- Appeal arbitrations
- special provisionsCost of arbitration proceedings; Advisory opinions; The CAS ad hoc jurisdiction; CAS Rules: particular aspects of appeals in doping matters under the Code; Substantive law governing dispute on appeal; The development of fundamental principles in anti-doping matters by CAS before the Code; The key principles developed by CAS in doping matters before the Code; Pre-Code CAS awards illustrating fundamental principles; Strict liability: rationale and need for clear rules.
- CAS 94/129, USA Shooting and Quigley v. International Shooting Union (UIT), Award of 23 May 1995, CAS Digest I, page 187Pre-Code CAS awards: strict liability justification for disqualification
- flexibility in fixed sanctions?; Arbitration CAS 95/141, C v. FINA, Award of 22 April 1996; Pre-Code CAS awards: CAS reviewing fixed sanctions in anti-doping policies; Arbitration CAS 95/150, V v. FINA, Award of 28 June 1996; CAS 98/214, B v. FIJ, Award of 17 March 1999; Pre-Code CAS awards: testing processes, procedural failures, B sample and application of lex mitior doctrine.
- CAS 98/184, P v. International Equestrian Federation, Award of 25 September 1998, CAS Digest II, page 197Pre-Code CAS awards: application of lex mitior doctrine; TAS 94/128, UCI and CONI (Italian National Olympic Committee); TAS 2001/A/318, V v. Fédération Cycliste Suisse; Different approaches by CAS Panels to discretion in relation to fixed sanctions; The lack of harmony relating to sanctions between anti-doping regimes before the Code; Illustrations: different outcomes; CAS 2001/A/318, V v. Fédération Cycliste Suisse (Swiss Cycling), Award of 23 April 2001, CAS Digest III, page 185.