Cargando…
Anarchy and Legal Order : Law and Politics for a Stateless Society.
This book elaborates and defends law without the state. It explains why the state is illegitimate, dangerous and unnecessary.
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge :
Cambridge University Press,
2012.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Cover; ANARCHY AND LEGAL ORDER; Title; Copyright; Dedication; Contents; Preface; Introduction; 1 Laying Foundations; I.A REASONABLE CONCEPTION OF THE GOOD LIFE WILL INVOLVE AN UNDERSTANDING OF BOTH WELFARE AND RIGHT ACTION; II. WELFARE IS MULTIDIMENSIONAL; A. Well-Being Is Diverse and Lacks a Substantive Essence; B. Welfare Is Not Preference-Satisfaction; C. Welfare Is Not a Pleasant Emotional Reaction; 1. It Is a Mistake to Identify Well-Being with a Positive Emotional State; 2. Emotions Necessarily Involve Cognitions.
- 3. Experiencing an Emotion Is Not Ordinarily the Goal of a Reasonable Action4. Welfare Is Not an Emotion; 5. Well-Being Is Not Identical with or Dependent on One's Emotional Reaction to One's Condition; D. Welfare Is Pluriform; 1. Multiple, Complementary Approaches Help Us Identify Basic Aspects of Well-Being; 2. We Take Something to Be a Dimension of Well-Being if We Treat It as a Basic Reason for Action; 3. Our Judgments about Harms Point Us to Insights about the Nature of Well-Being; 4. It May Be Self-Contradictory to Deny That Some Putative Aspects of Welfare Provide Reasons for Action.
- 5. Cross-Cultural Consensus May Help Us to Identify Basic Aspects of Well- Being6. We May Be Able to Justify Claims about Well-Being by Seeing How Well They Fit into Coherent Webs of Belief; 7. Varied Approaches to Identifying Aspects of Well-Being May Prove Mutually Supportive; E. The Various Dimensions of Welfare Are Incommensurable and Non-Fungible; F. To Recognize Something as an Aspect of Welfare Is to See a Reason to Pursue It for the Benefit of the Moral Patient of Whose; G. Welfare Is Reaction-Independent and Varied.
- III. REASONABLY SEEKING TO FLOURISH OR TO HELP ANOTHER TO FLOURISH REQUIRES RECOGNITION, FAIRNESS, AND RESPECTA. Living Well Means Acting Reasonably; B. The Principle of Recognition Calls for the Acknowledgment of All and Only Real Aspects of Well-Being as Worthy Objects of Action; C. The Principle of Fairness Calls for the Avoidance of Arbitrary Distinctions among Those Affected by Our Actions; 1. The Principle of Fairness Protects the Basic Moral Equality of Sentients Capable of Flourishing; 2. The Principle of Fairness Is Grounded in the Recognition of Shared Characteristics.
- 3. The Principle of Fairness Precludes Distinctions Not Made in Pursuit of Genuine Aspects of Well-Being4. The Principle of Fairness Precludes Distinctions an Actor Would Be Unwilling to Accept If Roles Were Reversed; 5. Accepting the Principle of Fairness Does Not Mean Embracing Impartial Consequentialism; 6. Fairness Is Quite Compatible with Pursuing Particular Projects; 7. Reasonableness Requires Fairness; D. The Principle of Respect Calls for the Avoidance of Purposeful and Instrumental Harm.