Cargando…

Death, Posthumous Harm, and Bioethics.

Death, Posthumous Harm, and Bioethics offers a highly distinctive and original approach to the metaphysics of death and applies this approach to contemporary debates in bioethics that address end-of-life and post-mortem issues. Taylor defends the controversial Epicurean view that death is not a harm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Taylor, James Stacey
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Hoboken : Taylor and Francis, 2012.
Colección:Routledge annals of bioethics.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Mu 4500
001 EBOOKCENTRAL_ocn818114871
003 OCoLC
005 20240329122006.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|---|||||
008 121101s2012 xx o 000 0 eng d
040 |a MHW  |b eng  |e pn  |c MHW  |d OCLCO  |d EBLCP  |d OCLCQ  |d UKDOC  |d OCLCQ  |d MERUC  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d SGP  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCL 
020 |a 9781136257766 
020 |a 1136257764 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000052914916 
035 |a (OCoLC)818114871 
050 4 |a BD444  |b .T39 2012 
082 0 4 |a 174.2 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Taylor, James Stacey. 
245 1 0 |a Death, Posthumous Harm, and Bioethics. 
260 |a Hoboken :  |b Taylor and Francis,  |c 2012. 
300 |a 1 online resource (243 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Routledge Annals of Bioethics 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
520 |a Death, Posthumous Harm, and Bioethics offers a highly distinctive and original approach to the metaphysics of death and applies this approach to contemporary debates in bioethics that address end-of-life and post-mortem issues. Taylor defends the controversial Epicurean view that death is not a harm to the person who dies and the neo-Epicurean thesis that persons cannot be affected by events that occur after their deaths, and hence that posthumous harms (and benefits) are impossible. He then extends this argument by asserting that the dead cannot be wronged, finally presenting a defence of rev. 
505 0 |a Cover; Title; Copyright; Dedication; Contents; Acknowledgments; Introduction: Death Unterrible; Full-blooded Epicureanism and Contemporary Bioethics; A Note on Methodology; Outline of this Volume; 1 Posthumous Harm and Interest-based Accounts of Well-being; The Intuitive Case for Posthumous Harm; The Anti-Hedonistic Intuition; Wronging the Dead; The Feinberg-Pitcher Argument for Posthumous Harm; Assessing the Argument for Posthumous Harm; Accommodating Orphaned Intuitions; Accommodating Feinberg's and Parfit's Anti-Hedonistic Intuitions; Can the Dead be Wronged? 
505 8 |a Portmore, Posthumous Harm, and the Desire Theory of WelfareConclusion; 2 Further Criticisms of the Possibility of Posthumous Harm; Levenbook's Account of Harm as Loss; Levenbook's Argument; Criticisms of Levenbook's Argument; Grover's Quality of Life Arguments; Grover's Argument; Criticisms of Grover's Argument; Sperling's Human Subject Account; Sperling's Argument; Criticisms of Sperling's Argument; Harm and Implication in Evil; Conclusion; 3 The Impossibility of Posthumous Harm; Death, Goods, and the Extinction of Desires; Responding to Luper; Towards Hedonism; Objects and Causes 
505 8 |a Conclusion4 Can the Dead Be Wronged?; Desert and Injustice; Blustein and the "Dear Departed"; Responses to Blustein's Arguments; Response to the Rescue from Insignificance Argument; Response to the Enduring Duties Argument; Response to the Reciprocity Argument; Rights and Interests; Conclusion; 5 Why Death Is Not a Harm to the One Who Dies; The Epicurean Argument; Hedonism Revisited; Death and Deprivation; Does a Person's Death Deprive Her of the Goods of Life?; Responses to these Deprivation-based Arguments for the Harm of Death; The Existence Variant and Presentism Defended; Conclusion 
505 8 |a 6 Fearless SymmetryLucretian Arguments; Challenges to the Lucretian Symmetry Argument; Responses to Nagel's Objection; Stoic fate; Hetherington's Symmetry Arguments; Earlier Birth and Personal Identity; Kaufman's Defense of Nagel's Argument; Responses to Kaufman; Responses to the Other Criticisms of this Lucretian Argument; The Backfire Problem; Feldman's Objection; Parfit's Hospital Example; Conclusion; 7 Epicureanism, Suicide, and Euthanasia; McMahan's Reconciliation Strategy; An Epicurean Approach to Suicide and Euthanasia; Suicide; Euthanasia; Conclusion 
505 8 |a 8 Epicureanism and Organ ProcurementEpicureanism and Policies of Presumed Consent; Presumed Consent and the "Fewer Mistakes" Arguments; Autonomy-based "Fewer Mistakes" Arguments; Gill's Arguments; Why Gill's Argument against the Qualitative "Fewer Mistakes" Argument Fails; Objections to Gill's Quantitative Autonomy-based "Fewer Mistakes" Argument; The "Fewer Mistakes" Arguments and Violations of Autonomy; Presumed Consent and Respect for Autonomy; From Presumed Consent to Organ Taking; The Standard Pro-Taking Argument; Two Unjustified Assumptions-Moving Towards Markets 
590 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b Ebook Central Academic Complete 
650 0 |a Death. 
650 0 |a Death  |x Moral and ethical aspects. 
650 0 |a Respect for persons. 
650 0 |a Dead. 
650 0 |a Bioethics. 
650 4 |a Bioethics. 
650 4 |a Dead. 
650 4 |a Death. 
650 4 |a Death  |x Moral and ethical aspects. 
650 4 |a Respect for persons. 
650 6 |a Respect de la personne. 
650 6 |a Morts. 
650 7 |a Bioethics  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Dead  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Death  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Death  |x Moral and ethical aspects  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Respect for persons  |2 fast 
758 |i has work:  |a Death, posthumous harm, and bioethics (Text)  |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFDTbP4PK8vx49vyCVRTjK  |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |z 9780415518840 
830 0 |a Routledge annals of bioethics. 
856 4 0 |u https://ebookcentral.uam.elogim.com/lib/uam-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1047200  |z Texto completo 
938 |a 123Library  |b 123L  |n 68885 
938 |a EBL - Ebook Library  |b EBLB  |n EBL1047200 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP