ICSID Reports Volume 6.

The ICSID Reports provides the only comprehensive collection of the decisions of arbitral tribunals and ad hoc committees established under the auspices of the World Bank's International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes. These decisions make an important contribution to the high...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Otros Autores: Crawford, James (Editor )
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2004.
Temas:
Investments, Foreign (International law) > Cases.
International commercial arbitration > Cases.
Investissements étrangers (Droit international) > Jurisprudence.
International commercial arbitration
Investments, Foreign (International law)
Trials, litigation, etc.
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • COVER
  • HALF-TITLE
  • TITLE
  • COPYRIGHT
  • CONTENTS
  • INTRODUCTION
  • EDITORIAL NOTE
  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
  • TABLE OF CASES REPORTED IN VOLUME 6
  • TABLE OF CASES REPORTED IN VOLUMES 1-6
  • DIGEST OF CASES IN VOLUME 6
  • Admissibility
  • Annulment
  • Arbitration
  • Arbitrators
  • Award
  • Compensation
  • Costs
  • Counterclaim
  • Damages
  • Diplomatic Protection
  • Discrimination
  • Expropriation
  • Foreign Investment
  • ICSID (Additional Facility)
  • Interest
  • Jurisdiction
  • Municipal Law
  • NAFTA
  • Nationality
  • Provisional Measures
  • Settlement
  • State Responsibility
  • Treaties.
  • CASES
  • Goetz and Others v. Republic of Burundi (Case No. ARB/95/3)
  • Award. 10 February 1999
  • FIRST PART: THE DECISION OF 2 SEPTEMBER 1998
  • I. The Facts
  • II. The Procedure
  • A. The Constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal
  • B. The Course of the Proceedings
  • C. The Defendant's Failure to Set Out His Side of the Case
  • III. The Claim
  • IV.
  • The Principal Characteristics of the Case
  • A. The Dominant Feature is the Existence of a Bilateral Treaty for the Encouragement and the Protection of Investments
  • B. The Case does not involve a State Contract.
  • V. The Jurisdiction of the Centre and of the Tribunal
  • VI. The Admissibility of the Claim
  • VII. The Facts
  • A. The Applicable Law
  • B. The Problem as it Relates to Burundian Law
  • C. The Problem as regards International Law
  • VIII. The Tribunal's Decision
  • SECOND PART: THE PARTIES' AGREEMENT OF 23 DECEMBER 1998
  • PROTOCOL OF AGREEMENT IN RELATION TO THE AMICABLE SETTLEMENT OF THE CASE OF "ANTOINE GOETZ AND
  • SPECIAL CONVENTION REGARDING THE FUNCTIONING OF THE AFFIMET COMPANY
  • TITLE I: GENERAL PROVISIONS
  • TITLE II. GENERAL GUARANTEES AND PARTICULAR ADVANTAGES.
  • TITLE III: UNDERTAKINGS OF THE COMPANY
  • TITLE IV: THE STATE'S UNDERTAKINGS
  • TITLE V: ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL GUARANTEES
  • TITLE VI: FINAL AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
  • United Mexican States v. Metalclad Corporation
  • Judicial Review, Supplementary Reasons for Judgment, Supreme Court of British Columbia. 31 October 2001
  • Lemire v. Ukraine (Case No. ARB(AF)/98/1)
  • Award. 18 September 2000
  • I. The Arbitral Proceedings
  • Procedural Matters
  • Settlement of the Dispute on Agreed Terms
  • II. The Award
  • I. Background
  • II. Settlement of the Dispute.
  • III. Principles of Interpretation and Implementation of the Agreement
  • I. Miscellaneous
  • Wena Hotels Ltd v. Arab Republic of Egypt (Case No. ARB/98/4)
  • DECISION ON JURISDICTION (29 JUNE 1999)
  • I. The Proceedings
  • II. The Facts
  • III. Respondent's Jurisdictional Objections
  • IV. Objection 1: "The Respondent has not Agreed to Arbitrate with the Claimant as it is, by Virtue of Ownership, to be
  • A. Article 8(1) of the ippaand Article 25 of the icsid Convention
  • B. The Parties' Interpretation of Article 8(1)
  • C. The Tribunal's Analysis
  • D. Conclusion.

Ejemplares similares