Cargando…

Aporetics : Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency.

The word apory stems from the Greek aporia, meaning impasse or perplexing difficulty. InAporetics, Nicholas Rescher defines an apory as a group of individually plausible but collectively incompatible theses. Rescher examines historic, formulaic, and systematic apories and couples these with aporetic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Rescher, Nicholas (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Pittsburgh : Chicago : University of Pittsburgh Press, Chicago Distribution Center [distributor] Aug. 2009 ;
Colección:University of Pittsburgh Press Digital Editions
University of Pittsburgh Digital Collections
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Mi 4500
001 EBOOKCENTRAL_ocn810039658
003 OCoLC
005 20240329122006.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|||||||||
008 090527e20090824pau eob 001 0 eng d
010 |z  2008037727 
040 |a COO  |b eng  |e pn  |c COO  |d OCLCQ  |d E7B  |d CCO  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCF  |d EBLCP  |d OCLCE  |d DOS  |d PIT  |d P@U  |d IDEBK  |d N$T  |d JSTOR  |d YDXCP  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d LOA  |d OCLCO  |d AGLDB  |d MOR  |d PIFAG  |d ZCU  |d OCLCQ  |d MERUC  |d OCLCQ  |d IOG  |d U3W  |d EZ9  |d COCUF  |d STF  |d OCLCQ  |d VTS  |d ICG  |d VT2  |d AU@  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d WYU  |d LVT  |d DKC  |d PIT  |d OCLCQ  |d UX1  |d HS0  |d UWK  |d ADU  |d OCLCQ  |d YKC  |d UKAHL  |d UKCRE  |d SNU  |d UKSSU  |d UK7LJ  |d MM9  |d OCLCQ  |d LDP  |d TUHNV  |d CNNOR  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d REDDC  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCL 
015 |a GBA8E0008  |2 bnb 
016 7 |a 014853529  |2 Uk 
019 |a 610576843  |a 648125110  |a 887802957  |a 961541361  |a 962566381  |a 966222008  |a 978633817  |a 978971778  |a 988478622  |a 992081432  |a 1018010135  |a 1023007674  |a 1037746724  |a 1045056580  |a 1045524172  |a 1055357163  |a 1064013778  |a 1065901250  |a 1081284837  |a 1101715932  |a 1109144394  |a 1110381980  |a 1112793172  |a 1119091250  |a 1119097653  |a 1126087156  |a 1153519422  |a 1154869653  |a 1154966174  |a 1156090805  |a 1156824949  |a 1228606803  |a 1249257929  |a 1257338955  |a 1257344628  |a 1259196938  |a 1415970483 
020 |a 9780822960577 
020 |a 0822960575  |q (Trade Paper) 
020 |a 9780822973683 
020 |a 0822973685 
020 |z 9780822943631  |q (cloth ;  |q alk. paper) 
020 |z 0822943638  |q (cloth ;  |q alk. paper) 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000051548128 
029 1 |a AU@  |b 000055827995 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV043055879 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV044050766 
029 1 |a DEBSZ  |b 446423408 
029 1 |a GBVCP  |b 1003711499 
029 1 |a NZ1  |b 14253579 
035 |a (OCoLC)810039658  |z (OCoLC)610576843  |z (OCoLC)648125110  |z (OCoLC)887802957  |z (OCoLC)961541361  |z (OCoLC)962566381  |z (OCoLC)966222008  |z (OCoLC)978633817  |z (OCoLC)978971778  |z (OCoLC)988478622  |z (OCoLC)992081432  |z (OCoLC)1018010135  |z (OCoLC)1023007674  |z (OCoLC)1037746724  |z (OCoLC)1045056580  |z (OCoLC)1045524172  |z (OCoLC)1055357163  |z (OCoLC)1064013778  |z (OCoLC)1065901250  |z (OCoLC)1081284837  |z (OCoLC)1101715932  |z (OCoLC)1109144394  |z (OCoLC)1110381980  |z (OCoLC)1112793172  |z (OCoLC)1119091250  |z (OCoLC)1119097653  |z (OCoLC)1126087156  |z (OCoLC)1153519422  |z (OCoLC)1154869653  |z (OCoLC)1154966174  |z (OCoLC)1156090805  |z (OCoLC)1156824949  |z (OCoLC)1228606803  |z (OCoLC)1249257929  |z (OCoLC)1257338955  |z (OCoLC)1257344628  |z (OCoLC)1259196938  |z (OCoLC)1415970483 
037 |b 00027370 
042 |a dlr 
050 4 |a B187.A66  |b R47 2009eb 
072 7 |a PHI  |x 004000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a PHI000000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a PHI011000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 121  |2 22 
084 |a CC 1100  |2 rvk 
084 |a CI 6585  |2 rvk 
084 |a 5,1  |2 ssgn 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Rescher, Nicholas,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Aporetics :  |b Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency. 
260 |a Pittsburgh :  |b University of Pittsburgh Press,  |c Aug. 2009 ;  |a Chicago :  |b Chicago Distribution Center [distributor] 
300 |a 1 online resource (176 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 8 |a The word apory stems from the Greek aporia, meaning impasse or perplexing difficulty. InAporetics, Nicholas Rescher defines an apory as a group of individually plausible but collectively incompatible theses. Rescher examines historic, formulaic, and systematic apories and couples these with aporetic theory from other authors to form this original and comprehensive survey. Citing thinkers from the pre-Socratics through Spinoza, Hegel, and Nicolai Hartmann, he builds a framework for coping with the complexities of divergent theses, and shows in detail how aporetic analysis can be applied to a variety of fields including philosophy, mathematics, linguistics, logic, and intellectual history. Rescher's in-depth examination reveals how aporetic inconsistency can be managed through a plausibility analysis that breaks the chain of inconsistency at its weakest link by deploying right-of-way precedence based on considerations of cognitive centrality. Thus while involvement with cognitive conflicts and inconsistencies are pervasive in human thought, aporetic analysis can provide an effective means of damage control. 
521 |a College Audience  |b University of Pittsburgh Press. 
505 0 |a The nature of apories -- Coherentism : an aporetic approach to empirical inquiry -- Counterfactual conditionals -- Variant analyses of counterfactuals and problems of probability -- The aporetics of counterfactual history -- Paradoxes -- Philosophical aporetics -- The dialectics of philosophical development -- The rationale of aporetic variation. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 153-157) and index. 
506 |3 Use copy  |f Restrictions unspecified  |2 star  |5 MiAaHDL 
533 |a Electronic reproduction.  |b Pittsburgh, Pa.:  |c University of Pittsburgh Digital Research Library.  |f (University of Pittsburgh Press Digital Editions)  |5 PPiU 
533 |a Electronic reproduction.  |b [Place of publication not identified] :  |c HathiTrust Digital Library,  |d 2010.  |5 MiAaHDL 
538 |a Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002.  |u http://purl.oclc.org/DLF/benchrepro0212  |5 MiAaHDL 
583 1 |a digitized  |c 2010  |h HathiTrust Digital Library  |l committed to preserve  |2 pda  |5 MiAaHDL 
546 |a English. 
590 |a JSTOR  |b Books at JSTOR Demand Driven Acquisitions (DDA) 
590 |a eBooks on EBSCOhost  |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide 
590 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b Ebook Central Academic Complete 
650 0 |a Aporia. 
650 6 |a Aporie (Philosophie) 
650 7 |a PHILOSOPHY  |x Epistemology.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a PHILOSOPHY  |x General.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Aporia  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Rationalität  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Aporie  |2 gnd 
650 7 |a Kontrafaktisches Denken  |2 gnd 
650 1 7 |a Aporie.  |2 gtt 
650 7 |a Aporia.  |2 sao 
758 |i has work:  |a Aporetics (Text)  |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCXgVXVtCH8W4Qq8XVyYRYX  |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Rescher, Nicholas.  |t Aporetics.  |d Pittsburgh, Pa. : University of Pittsburgh Press, ©2009  |w (DLC) 2008037727  |w (OCoLC)228363860 
830 0 |a University of Pittsburgh Press Digital Editions  |5 PPiU 
830 0 |a University of Pittsburgh Digital Collections  |5 PPiU 
856 4 0 |u https://ebookcentral.uam.elogim.com/lib/uam-ebooks/detail.action?docID=2039255  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH36650875 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL2039255 
938 |a ebrary  |b EBRY  |n ebr10863972 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 829217 
938 |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection  |b IDEB  |n cis28119855 
938 |a Project MUSE  |b MUSE  |n muse3429 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 10382068 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP