Cargando…
Carbon Capture and Sequestration : Removing the Legal and Regulatory Barriers.
The United States produces over seventy percent of all its electricity from fossil fuels and nearly & amp;nbsp;fifty percent & amp;nbsp;from coal alone. Worldwide, forty-one percent of all electricity is generated from coal, making it the single most important fuel source for electricity gen...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Otros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Hoboken :
Taylor and Francis,
2012.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Front Cover; Carbon Capture and Sequestration; Copyright Page; Contents; List of Figures and Tables; List of Authors; Preface; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; 1 The Importance of Carbon Capture and Geologic Sequestration in a Carbon Constrained World; 1.1 Why does the World still need Fossil Fuel?; 1.2 Carbon Capture with Geologic Sequestration (CCS); 1.3 Underground Injection Today; 1.4 The Boundaries and Life Cycle of a CCS Project; 1.5 The Reason for this Book; 2 Technology for Carbon Capture and Geologic Sequestration; 2.1 Overview of CO2 Capture Technology and its Application.
- 2.2 Capture of CO2 from Electric Power Generation2.3 Capturing CO2 from Industrial Processes; 2.4 Capturing CO2 Directly from the Air; 2.5 Overview of CO2 Transport Options; 2.6 Overview of Geologic Sequestration and the Sequestration Project Life Cycle; 2.7 Practical Experience with GS Technology; 2.8 Enhanced Oil Recovery and its Relationship to Geologic Sequestration; 3 Siting CO2 Pipelines for Geologic Sequestration; 3.1 Existing Federal Regulation of CO2 Pipelines.
- 3.2 Existing Regulation of Siting, Rate Setting, Safety, and Access to CO2 Pipelines in Selected States (Texas, New Mexico, Ohio, and Pennsylvania)3.3 Adequacy of Existing Laws; 3.4 Options for Creating a CO2 Pipeline Regulatory Framework; 3.5 Recommendations for Regulating CO2 Pipelines; 4 Permitting Geologic Sequestration Sites; 4.1 The US EPA Underground Injection Control Program; 4.2 The Role of the States; 4.3 Community Engagement During the Permitting Process; 4.4 Recommendations for Permitting GS Sites; 5 Learning from and Adapting to Changes in Geologic Sequestration Technology.
- 5.1 Performance-Based Regulation5.2 Examples of Performance-Based Regulation; 5.3 Adaptive Regulation; 5.4 Examples of Adaptive Regulation; 5.5 Assessment of Current Rules for Geologic Sequestration; 5.6 Recommendations on Learning and Adaptation; 6 Access to Pore Space for Geologic Sequestration; 6.1 Competing Uses of the Subsurface; 6.2 Who Owns Pore Space in the US?; 6.3 Does the Use of Pore Space for GS Require Compensation Under the Law?; 6.4 Alternative Models for the Acquisition of the Right to Use Pore Space for Fluid Injection.
- 6.5 Potential Legal Frameworks for Managing GS Access to Pore Space6.6 A Federally Coordinated Framework would be Optimal; 6.7 Authority to Permit Geologic CO2 Sequestration on Federal Lands; 6.8 Recommendations on Access to Pore Space; 7 Liability and the Management of Long-Term Stewardship; 7.1 Liability Across a Project's Life Cycle; 7.2 Designing a Strategy to Manage Long-Term Stewardship; 7.3 Types of Liability that May Arise During Long-Term Stewardship; 7.4 A Hybrid Approach to Liability During Long-Term Stewardship; 7.5 First-Mover Projects.