Cargando…

Ethnic Struggle, Coexistence, and Democratization in Eastern Europe.

Argues that protest by ethnic Hungarians in Romania and Slovakia brought about policy changes and integrated Hungarian minorities into the democratic process.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Stroschein, Sherrill
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Colección:Cambridge studies in contentious politics.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Cover; Ethnic Struggle, Coexistence, and Democratization in Eastern Europe; Cambridge Studies in Contentious Politics; Title; Copyright; Dedication; Contents; Figures and Tables; Preface; FIELDWORK AND ETHNOGRAPHY; NEWSPAPERS AND FIELDWORK; A NOTE ON LANGUAGE AND TERMS; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Terms; 1 Ethnic Protest, Moderation, and Democratization; I. APPROACHES TO EVIDENCE; II. PROTEST AND DEMOCRATIZATION; III. DE FACTO DELIBERATION, MODERATION, AND DEMOCRATIZATION; III. A. Transformation of Group Stances and Goals.
  • III. B. Ordinary People and Extra-Institutional PoliticsIV. UNDERSTANDING RELATIONAL DYNAMICS; IV. A.A Model of Relations between Actors; IV. B. Mechanisms of Mobilization and Moderation; IV. C. Social Structure and Local Mobilization; V. COUNTERARGUMENTS; V.A. Group Conflict Rather than Moderation; V.B. Ethnofederalism and Mobilization; V.C. Economic and Material Factors; V.D. International Influences; V.E. Elites; VI. NEXT STEPS; 2 Time, Process, and Events in Democratization; I.A FOCUS ON TIME: INCREMENTALISM AND PROCESSES; II. PREMISES OF HISTORICAL INSTITUTIONALISM.
  • II. A. Timing and SequenceII. B. Incrementalism and Cumulative Effects; II. C. Path Dependence, Feedback Effects, and Endogeneity; III. DATA FOR EVENT ANALYSIS; III. A. Sample Cities; Cluj-Napoca/Kolozsvár (Romanian Majority); Miercurea Ciuc/Csíkszereda (Hungarian Majority); Târgu Mures/Marosvásárhely (Split); Košice/Kassa (Slovak Majority); Komárno/Komárom (Hungarian Majority); Rimavská Sobota/Rimaszombat (Split); Uzhhorod (Uzhgorod)/Ungvár (Slav Majority); Berehove (Beregovo)/Beregszász (Hungarian Majority); Chop/Csap (Split); III. B. Cases, Claims, and Comparing.
  • IV. A SEARCH FOR CAUSAL MECHANISMSV. EXAMINING TRAJECTORIES OVER TIME; V.A. Actions of Elites and Masses of Each Group, in Interaction; V.B. Local Mechanisms of Mobilization; The Mass-First Mechanism; Cross-Group Emulation; Mass-Elite Tandem for Minorities; V.C.A Caveat on Violence; VI. ETHNIC GROUP MOBILIZATION TRAJECTORIES AND STATE POLICY; VI. A. Ethnic Mobilization from a Macro View; VI. B. State Policy; VI. C. Protest and Policy; VI. D. Dynamics of Democratic Consolidation and Policy Formation in Divided States; Windows of Opportunity.
  • Government Change in Status Quo Sparks Hungarian ProtestProtest Forces Government to Accept Compromise; More Lenient Government Stance toward Minorities Sparks Titular Protest; Emulation and Titular Protest; VI. E. Causal Claims on Ethnic Contention and Policy Formation; VII. CONCLUSIONS; 3 Ethnic Contention in Context; I.A BRIEF HISTORY OF ETHNIC INTERACTIONS; I.A.A "True" History?; I.B. Justification for Territorial Control: Who Was Here First?; I.C. Disputed Legacies of the Austro.-Hungarian Empire; I.D. Disputing Hungary's "Mutilation": World War I and the Treaty of Trianon.