Cargando…

Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment : Spring 1998 Status Report on Argonne National Laboratory's R & D Activity.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Washington : Ipswich : National Academies Press, Ebsco Publishing [distributor] 1998 ;
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • ELECTROMETALLURGICAL TECHNIQUES FOR DOE SPENT FUEL TREATMENT
  • Copyright
  • Acknowledgment of Reviewers
  • Executive Summary
  • INTRODUCTION
  • SPENT FUEL OPERATIONS
  • ALTERNATIVE EBR-II SPENT FUEL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
  • Direct Disposal
  • Glass Material Oxidation and Dissolution System
  • Melt and Dilute
  • PUREX
  • Chloride Volatility
  • Plasma Arc
  • Findings
  • DEMONSTRATION PROJECT SUCCESS CRITERIA
  • Findings
  • RECOMMENDATIONS
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Spent Fuel Operations
  • ELECTROMETALLURGICAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROGRESS SUMMARY THROUGH MARCH 17, 1998Committee Meeting, Argonne National Laboratory-West, November 20-21, 1997
  • Electrorefining at ANL-W
  • Electrorefining at ANL-E
  • Committee Meeting, Washington, D.C., March 16-17, 1998
  • SUMMARY COMMENTS ON WASTE FORM ISSUES RELATED TO THE ELECTROMETALLURGICAL TECHNIQUE FOR EBR-II SPENTâ€?
  • 3 Alternative EBR-II Spent Fuel Treatment Technologies
  • DIRECT DISPOSAL
  • GLASS MATERIAL OXIDATION AND DISSOLUTION SYSTEM
  • MELT AND DILUTE
  • THE PUREX PROCESS AND SAVANNAH RIVER SITE FACILITIES CHLORIDE VOLATILITY
  • DIRECT PLASMA ARC-VITREOUS CERAMIC PROCESS
  • COMMITTEE ANALYSIS
  • Direct Disposal
  • Glass Material Oxidation and Dissolution System
  • Melt and Dilute
  • PUREX
  • Chloride Volatility
  • Plasma Arc
  • FINDINGS
  • 4 Demonstration Project Success Criteria
  • EBR-II SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL TREATMENT DEMONSTRATION SUCCESS CRITERIA
  • Criterion 1: Demonstration that 125 EBR-II assemblies can be treated in a fuel-conditioning facilityâ€?
  • Criterion 2: Quantification (for both composition and mass) of recycle, waste, and product streamsâ€?Criterion 3: Demonstration of an overall dependable and predictable process, considering uptime, â€?
  • Criterion 4: Demonstration that safety risks, environmental impacts, and nuclear materialsâ€?
  • FINDINGS
  • 5 Recommendations
  • Appendixes
  • Appendix A Letters from the Department of Energy to the Committee on Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuelâ€?
  • APPENDIX B ANL Monthly Highlights of the Electrometallurgical Treatment Program
  • Electrometallurgical Treatment Program Monthly Highlights for September 1997Electrometallurgical Treatment Program Monthly Highlights for October 1997
  • Electrometallurgical Treatment Program Monthly Highlights for November 1997
  • Electrometallurgical Treatment Program Monthly Highlights for December 1997
  • Electrometallurgical Treatment Program Monthly Highlights for January 1998
  • Electrometallurgical Treatment Program Monthly Highlights for February 1998
  • Electrometallurgical Treatment Program Monthly Highlights for March 1998