Cargando…
The Supreme Court in the Intimate Lives of Americans : Birth, Sex, Marriage, Childrearing, and Death.
Choice Outstanding Academic Title 2003. Personal rights, such as the right to procreate--or not--and the right to die generate endless debate. This book maps out the legal, political, and ethical issues swirling around personal rights. Howard Ball shows how the Supreme Court has grappled with the ri...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
New York :
NYU Press,
2002.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Acknowledgments; Introduction; 1 "Fundamental" Rights versus State Interests:The Balancing Process; I "I Am Not Talking Very Much Like a Lawyer"; II The U.S. Supreme Court and "Fundamental" Rights; Case Study: Palko v Connecticut, 1937; III The Liberty and Rights Protected by the DueProcess Clause; Case Study: Lochner v New York, 1905; Case Study: U.S. v Carolene Products, 1938, Footnote 4; IV Is There a Protected Liberty Interest for PersonsHaving Intimate Homosexual Relations?; Case Study: Bowers v Hardwick, 1986; Case Study: Roy Romer, Governor v Richard Evanset al., 1996.
- V The Limits of Sexual PrivacyVI Summing Up; 2 Marriage and Marital Privacy; I "I Should Like to Suggest a Substantial Change forYour Consideration"; II Heterosexual Marriage; Case Study: Skinner v Oklahoma, 1942; III Molecular Changes in the Definition and Reality ofthe Traditional Marital Relationship; Case Study: Bradwell v Illinois, 1872; Case Study: Griswold v Connecticut, 1965; IV The Dilemma of Intimate Violence and Congressional Passage of the Violence AgainstWomen Act (VAWA), 1994.
- Case Study: Joshua DeShaney, a minor, by hisguardian ad litem, et al., v Winnebago County, Wisconsin Department of Social Services, et al., 1988Case Study: U.S. v Morrison, 1999; V Same-Sex Marriage; Case Study: Stan Baker, et al. v State of Vermont, et al., 1999; VI Congressional Passage of the Defense of Marriage Act(DOMA), 1996; Case Study: Nina Baehr v Miike, 1996, 1999; VII Summing Up; 3 The "Rhapsody of the Unitary Family"; I "Something Smells about This Case"; II Who Is Family?; Case Study: Village of Belle Terre v Bruce Boraas, 1974; III Family Privacy versus State Interests.
- Case Study: Reynolds v U.S., 1878Case Study: Michael H. v Gerald D., 1989; IV Family Privacy Rights versus Personal Autonomy and Other Constitutional Rights; Case Study: Time, Inc. v Hill, 1967; Case Study: Eisenstadt v Baird, 1971; V Summing Up; 4 Motherhood or Not, That Is Her Decision; I "I Will Be God-damned!"; II Not Having Children: Abortion as a Personal Right; Case Study: Roe v Wade, 1972; Case Study: Webster v Reproductive HealthServices, 1989; III. After Roe, What Are the Limits of "State Actions" ThatRegulate the Abortion Procedure?; IV After Roe, What Are a Husband's Rights?
- Case Study: Planned Parenthood of SoutheasternPennsylvania v Casey, 1992V When a Minor Daughter Wants to TerminateHer Pregnancy; VI Back into the Vortex: The "Partial Birth"AbortionControversy; Case Study: Stenberg v Carhart, 1999; VII Summing Up; 5 Raising the Child: "Father Knows Best"?; I "This Is Really a Ridiculous Case to Be AbsorbingOur Time"; II Raising and Educating Children; Case Study: Wisconsin v Yoder, 1972; III The Mental and Physical Health and Welfare ofthe Child; Case Study: Parham v J.R., 1979; Case Study: Ingraham v Wright, 1977.