The limits of legal reasoning and the European Court of Justice /

Mostrar otras versiones (1)

Gerard Conway explains how judges of the ECJ should be understood as sharing the same interpretative perspective as the law-maker.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Conway, Gerard, 1976-
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Colección:Cambridge studies in European law and policy.
Temas:
Court of Justice of the European Communities.
Court of Justice of the European Communities
Judicial process > European Union countries.
Law > European Union countries > Interpretation and construction.
Law > European Union countries > Methodology.
Processus judiciaire > Pays de l'Union européenne.
Droit > Pays de l'Union européenne > Interprétation.
LAW > International.
LAW > Civil Procedure.
LAW > Legal Services.
POLITICAL SCIENCE > Government > Judicial Branch.
UE/CE Cour de justice.
UE/CE Droit.
Interprétation des lois.
Jurisprudence.
Droit constitutionnel.
Judicial process
Law > Interpretation and construction
Law > Methodology
European Union countries
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Introduction and overview : interpretation and the European Court of Justice
  • Reading the Court of Justice
  • Reconceptualising the legal reasoning of the Court of Justice : interpretation and its constraints
  • Retrieving a separation of powers in the European Union
  • EU law and a hierarchy of interpretative techniques
  • Levels of generality and originalist interpretation in the legal reasoning of the ECJ
  • Subjective originalist interpretation in the legal reasoning of the ECJ
  • Conclusion.

Ejemplares similares