Topical Relevance in Argumentation.

It is a longstanding if not altogether coherent tradition of logic and rhetorical studies that an argument can be incorrect or fallacious in virtue of some proposition in it being "irrelevant". This monograph clarifies that tradition. Non-classical propositional calculi, including relevanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Walton, Douglas
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Amsterdam/Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1982.
Colección:Pragmatics & beyond ; 3:8.
Temas:
Reasoning.
Relevance (Philosophy)
Debates and debating.
Logic.
Pertinence (Philosophie)
Débats et controverses.
debates.
Debates and debating
Logic
Reasoning
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Mu 4500
001 EBOOKCENTRAL_ocn769342243
003 OCoLC
005 20240329122006.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|---|||||
008 111226s1982 pau o 000 0 eng d
010 |z  2003541667 
040 |a EBLCP  |b eng  |e pn  |c EBLCP  |d IDEBK  |d MERUC  |d OCLCQ  |d YDXCP  |d OCLCQ  |d ZCU  |d OCLCQ  |d ICG  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCQ  |d DKC  |d OCLCQ  |d UKAHL  |d OCLCQ  |d HS0  |d VHC  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCL 
019 |a 1109219394  |a 1162571174  |a 1241927319  |a 1259071107  |a 1290084908  |a 1300564427  |a 1303405666  |a 1306570844  |a 1398131462  |a 1409721534 
020 |a 9789027280572 
020 |a 9027280576 
020 |a 1283359553 
020 |a 9781283359559 
020 |a 9786613359551 
020 |a 6613359556 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV044159343 
035 |a (OCoLC)769342243  |z (OCoLC)1109219394  |z (OCoLC)1162571174  |z (OCoLC)1241927319  |z (OCoLC)1259071107  |z (OCoLC)1290084908  |z (OCoLC)1300564427  |z (OCoLC)1303405666  |z (OCoLC)1306570844  |z (OCoLC)1398131462  |z (OCoLC)1409721534 
050 4 |a BC177 
082 0 4 |a 160 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Walton, Douglas. 
245 1 0 |a Topical Relevance in Argumentation. 
260 |a Amsterdam/Philadelphia :  |b John Benjamins Publishing Company,  |c 1982. 
300 |a 1 online resource (89 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Pragmatics & beyond,  |x 0166-6258 ;  |v 3:8 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
505 0 |a TOPICAL RELEVANCE IN ARGUMENTATION; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; Dedication; Acknowledgements; Table of contents; 1. CONVERSATIONAL ALLEGATIONS OF IRRELEVANCE; 1.0 Objective of Study; 1.1 Dual Nature of Pragmatic Analysis; 1.2 Disputation Theory; 1.3 Standard Preconceptions o f Irrelevance; 1.4 Fallacies o f Emotional Distraction; 1.5 Ad Misericordiam Arguments; 1.6 A Contrastive Case Study; 1.7 The Ad Hominem Fallacy; 1.8 Relevant Answers to Questions; IMMIGRATION TIMOTHY LEARY: REASON ALLOWED TO ENTER CANADA; 1.9 A Second Case Study of Question-Relevance. 
505 8 |a ENERGY SALE OF GASOLINE TO UNITED STATES CITIZENS1.10 Function o f Questioning in Parliamentary Debate; 2. PROPOSITIONAL INFERENCES IN DISPUTATION; 2.0 Relevance in Games of Dialogue; 2.1 Refutation and Propositional Structure; 2.2 Classical Propositional Logic: Basic Elements; 2.3 Valid Arguments in Classical Logic; 2.4 Astounding Inferences in Classical Logic; 2.5 Relatedness Propositional Logic: Basic Elements; 2.6 Valid Arguments in Relatedness Logic; 2.7 The Astounding Inferences Revisited; 2.8 The Propositional Core of Disputation; 3. PARADOXES, SOPHISMS AND RELATEDNESS. 
505 8 |a 3.0 The Meaning of Relatedness3.1 Act-Sequences and Relatedness; 3.2 Subject-Matter Contents of Propositions; 3.3 Paradoxes and Astounding Inferences; 3.4 Missing Factors; 3.5 Needed Premisses in Inferences; 3.6 Irrelevant Premisses; 3.7. Pluralism of Concepts of Relevance; 3.8 Information Inclusion; 4. CRITICISMS OF IRRELEVANCE IN GAMES OF DIALOGUE; 4.0 Six Types of Criticisms of Irrelevance; 4.1 Varieties of Games; 4.2 Strong and Weak Refutation; 4.3 Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Games; 4.4 Misconception of Refutation; 4.5 Pertinence; 4.6 Question-Answer Relevance. 
505 8 |a 4.7 Types of Questions and Answers4.8 Rules o f Responding; 4.9 Types of Relevance Compared; 4.10 Conditionals in Disputation; NOTES; REFERENCES; INDEX. 
520 |a It is a longstanding if not altogether coherent tradition of logic and rhetorical studies that an argument can be incorrect or fallacious in virtue of some proposition in it being "irrelevant". This monograph clarifies that tradition. Non-classical propositional calculi, including relevance logics and relatedness logics, are juxtaposed against conversational criticisms of irrelevance in natural argumentation, e.g. in parliamentary debates. The object is to see if there is a reasonable way of evaluating criticisms like "That's beside the point!" or "That's irrelevant!" 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 76-79). 
546 |a English. 
590 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b Ebook Central Academic Complete 
650 0 |a Reasoning. 
650 0 |a Relevance (Philosophy) 
650 0 |a Debates and debating. 
650 0 |a Logic. 
650 6 |a Pertinence (Philosophie) 
650 6 |a Débats et controverses. 
650 7 |a debates.  |2 aat 
650 7 |a Debates and debating  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Logic  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Reasoning  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Relevance (Philosophy)  |2 fast 
758 |i has work:  |a Topical relevance in argumentation (Text)  |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGgttbCgKKC6RCxgf6GBHd  |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Walton, Douglas.  |t Topical Relevance in Argumentation.  |d Amsterdam/Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company, ©1982  |z 9789027225245 
830 0 |a Pragmatics & beyond ;  |v 3:8. 
856 4 0 |u https://ebookcentral.uam.elogim.com/lib/uam-ebooks/detail.action?docID=805849  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH28556584 
938 |a EBL - Ebook Library  |b EBLB  |n EBL805849 
938 |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection  |b IDEB  |n 335955 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 7279904 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP 

Ejemplares similares