Cargando…
Contexts of Understanding.
This essay deals with the difficulty of understanding understanding, taking the understanding of natural language fragments as a paradigm.
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Amsterdam/Philadelphia :
John Benjamins Publishing Company,
1980.
|
| Colección: | Pragmatics & beyond ;
1:6. |
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- CONTEXTS OF UNDERSTANDING; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; PREFACE; Table of contents; 1. INTRODUCTION; 1.1 The difficulty of understanding understanding; 1.2 Understanding versus explanation, interpretation and translation; 1.3 Aspects of a psycho-pragmatic theory of understanding; 2. SIGNIFICANCE AND UNDERSTANDING; 2.1 Acceptance; 2.2 What we understand when understanding; 2.3 How we understand when understanding; 2.4 Presentification and de s crib ability; 3. PERSPECTIVAL UNDERSTANDING; 3.1 PROLEGOMENA; 3.1.1. The heuristic orientation of the theory of language.
- 3.1.2 The pragmatic orientation of the theory of understanding3.1.3. The epistemological orientation of the theory of understanding; 3.2 FREGEAN INTERLUDE; 3.3 f(p* ...); 3.3..1, The paratactic analysis of {sense, force}; 3.3.2, f is neither a mode nor an attitude but rather a mood; 3.3.3. f is not a representation but an act-indicator; 3.4. p[(f(p* ...)]; 3.4.1. The reductionistic analysis of the 'community of significance'; 3.4.2. The function of the n-operator; 4. CONTEXTUALISM AND TRANSCENDENTALISM IN THE THEORY OF UNDERSTANDING; 4.1. CONTEXTUALISM; 4.1.1. Types of contexts; CO-TEXT.
- INTRINSIC CONTEXTEXTRINSIC CONTEXT; C(p); B(p); C(f); B(f); B(p); C(p); 4.2. TRANSCENDENTALISM; 4.2.1. Psycho-pragmatic transcendentalia; 4.2.2. The Parsimony Principle; FOOTNOTES; REFERENCES.