Nothing to hide : the false tradeoff between privacy and security /

Mostrar otras versiones (1)

"If you've got nothing to hide," many people say, "you shouldn't worry about government surveillance." Others argue that we must sacrifice privacy for security. But as Daniel J. Solove argues in this important book, these arguments and many others are flawed. They are b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Solove, Daniel J., 1972-
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: New Haven [Conn.] : Yale University Press, ©2011.
Temas:
Universidad Sergio Arboleda
Privacy, Right of > United States.
Law enforcement > United States.
National security > Law and legislation > United States.
Lois > Application > États-Unis.
LAW > Constitutional.
LAW > Public.
Law enforcement
National security > Law and legislation
Privacy, Right of
Sicherheitspolitik
Persönlichkeitsrecht
United States
Verenigde Staten.
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • The nothing-to-hide argument
  • The all-or-nothing fallacy
  • The danger of deference
  • Why privacy isn't merely an individual right
  • The pendulum argument
  • The national-security argument
  • The problem with dissolving the crime-espionage distinction
  • The war-powers argument and the rule of law
  • The Fourth Amendment and the secrecy paradigm
  • The third party doctrine and digital dossiers
  • The failure of looking for a reasonable expectation of privacy
  • The suspicionless-searches argument
  • Should we keep the exclusionary rule?
  • The first amendment as criminal procedure
  • Will repealing the Patriot Act restore our privacy?
  • The law-and-technology problem and the leave-it-to-the-legislature argument
  • Video surveillance and the no-privacy-in-public argument
  • Should the government engage in data mining?
  • The Luddite argument, the Titanic phenomenon, and the fix-a-problem strategy.

Ejemplares similares