How professors think : inside the curious world of academic judgment /

Mostrar otras versiones (1)

Judging quality isn't robotically rational; it's emotional, cognitive, and social, too. Yet most academics' self-respect is rooted in their ability to analyze complexity and recognize quality, in order to come to the fairest decisions about that elusive god, "excellence." In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Lamont, Michèle, 1957- (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 2009.
Temas:
College teachers > Rating of.
Peer review.
Teacher effectiveness.
Portfolios in education.
Peer Review
Professeurs (Enseignement supérieur) > Évaluation.
Évaluation par des pairs.
Enseignants > Efficacité.
Portfolios en éducation.
review (function)
EDUCATION > Higher.
SOCIAL SCIENCE > General.
College teachers > Rating of
Peer review
Portfolios in education
Teacher effectiveness
Peer-Group
Qualitätssicherung
Hochschullehrer
Evaluation
Wetenschap.
Wetenschapsbeoefening.
Kwaliteit.
Meningsvorming.
Evaluatie.
Vakgebieden.
Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift > Manuskript > Evaluation.
Manuskript > Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift > Evaluation.
Hochschullehrer > Evaluation.
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Opening the black box of peer review
  • How panels work
  • On disciplinary cultures
  • Pragmatic fairness : customary rules of deliberation
  • Recognizing various kinds of excellence
  • Considering interdisciplinarity and diversity
  • Implications in the United States and abroad.

Ejemplares similares