David's hammer : the case for an activist judiciary /
Judicial activism is condemned by both right and left, for good reason: lawless courts are a threat to republican government. But challenging conventional wisdom, constitutional litigator Clint Bolick argues in Davids Hammer that far worse is a judiciary that allows the other branches of government...
Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
---|---|
Autor principal: | |
Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Washington, D.C. :
Cato Institute,
©2007.
|
Temas: | |
Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Sumario: | Judicial activism is condemned by both right and left, for good reason: lawless courts are a threat to republican government. But challenging conventional wisdom, constitutional litigator Clint Bolick argues in Davids Hammer that far worse is a judiciary that allows the other branches of government to run roughshod over precious liberties. That, Bolick demonstrates, is exactly the role the framers intended the courts to play, envisioning a judiciary deferential to proper democratic governance but bold in defense of freedom. But the historical record is painfully uneven. During the Warren era. |
---|---|
Descripción Física: | 1 online resource (206 pages) |
Bibliografía: | Includes bibliographical references (pages 165-177) and index. |
ISBN: | 9781933995304 1933995300 1281905275 9781281905277 |