The double redaction of the Deuteronomistic history /
Martin Noth argued that in the books of Joshua-Kings could be seen the work of a single, purposeful author or historian-a hypothesis which, although close to becoming one of those rare 'assured results of critical scholarship', has recently encountered criticism. Nelson observes that Noth&...
Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
---|---|
Autor principal: | |
Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Sheffield :
JSOT Press, Dept. of Biblical Studies, University of Sheffield,
1981.
|
Colección: | Journal for the study of the Old Testament. Supplement series ;
18. |
Temas: | |
Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- 1. The dual redaction hypothesis in Kings
- History of the hypothesis
- The classical arguments for the theory of dual redaction
- 2. The regnal formulae in Kings
- Recent study of the regnal formulae
- Free variation in the historian's formulae
- Rigidity in the exilic editor's formulae
- The cAm ha-ares and the verdict formulae
- 3. The additions of the exilic editor and their distinctive linguistic features
- Secondary Deuteronomistic passages in Judges
- Secondary passages in Kings related to those in Judges
- Other secondary passages in Kings
- The exilic editor outside Judges and Kings
- 4. Dynastic oracle in the Deuteronomistic history
- The conditional promises
- The unconditional promises
- 5. Towards a theology of the two Deuteronomists
- The temper of their times
- Four theological themes
- Appendix: Isaiah's prediction of a Babylonian disaster.