Cargando…

The double redaction of the Deuteronomistic history /

Martin Noth argued that in the books of Joshua-Kings could be seen the work of a single, purposeful author or historian-a hypothesis which, although close to becoming one of those rare 'assured results of critical scholarship', has recently encountered criticism. Nelson observes that Noth&...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Nelson, Richard D. (Richard Donald), 1945-
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Sheffield : JSOT Press, Dept. of Biblical Studies, University of Sheffield, 1981.
Colección:Journal for the study of the Old Testament. Supplement series ; 18.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • 1. The dual redaction hypothesis in Kings
  • History of the hypothesis
  • The classical arguments for the theory of dual redaction
  • 2. The regnal formulae in Kings
  • Recent study of the regnal formulae
  • Free variation in the historian's formulae
  • Rigidity in the exilic editor's formulae
  • The cAm ha-ares and the verdict formulae
  • 3. The additions of the exilic editor and their distinctive linguistic features
  • Secondary Deuteronomistic passages in Judges
  • Secondary passages in Kings related to those in Judges
  • Other secondary passages in Kings
  • The exilic editor outside Judges and Kings
  • 4. Dynastic oracle in the Deuteronomistic history
  • The conditional promises
  • The unconditional promises
  • 5. Towards a theology of the two Deuteronomists
  • The temper of their times
  • Four theological themes
  • Appendix: Isaiah's prediction of a Babylonian disaster.