Cargando…
Warrant : the current debate.
Contemporary epistemologists seldom focus attention on the nature of warrant; and when they do, they display deplorable diversity. The author argues that none of their claims is correct, and suggests a more satisfactory alternative. He surveys current contributions to the discussion of warrant and n...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Autor Corporativo: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
New York :
Oxford University Press,
1993.
|
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Contents
- 1. Justification, Internalism, and Deontology
- I. Internalism
- II. Justification
- III. Classical Deontologism
- IV. Deontology and Internalism
- V. Back to the Present
- 2. Classical Chisholmian Internalism
- I. The Central Idea
- II. Classical Chisholmian Internalism Rejected
- III. Justification versus Warrant
- 3. Post-Classical Chisholmian Internalism
- I. Post-Classicalism Explained
- II. Problems with Post-Classical Chisholmian Internalism
- 4. Coherentism
- I. Ordinary Foundationalism
- II. Coherentism
- III. Classical Foundationalism5. Bonjourian Coherentism
- I. Bonjourian Coherentism Explained
- II. Bonjourian Coherentism Examined
- 6. Bayesian Coherentism and Warrant
- I. Bayesianism Explained
- II. Bayesianism and Warrant
- 7. Bayesian Coherentism and Rationality
- I. The Varieties of Rationality
- II. Bayesian Constraints and Rationality
- 8. Pollockian Quasi-Iriternalism
- I. Pollockian Epistemic Norms
- II. Justification and Objective Justification
- III. Problems
- IV. New Directions
- 9. Reliabilism
- I. Alstonian Justification
- II. Dretskian ReliabilismIII. Goldmanian Reliabilism
- IV. Concluding Peroration
- 10. Prospect and Retrospect
- Appendix
- Index
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- K
- L
- M
- N
- P
- Q
- R
- S
- T
- U
- V
- W
- Z