Cargando…

Affirmative action and racial preference : a debate /

Cohen and Sterba, two contemporary philosophers in sharp opposition, debate the value of affirmative action and racial preference. They defend thier views with analysis and commentay on landmark cases - including the decisions of the United States Supreme Court and the University of Michigan admissi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Cohen, Carl, 1931-
Otros Autores: Sterba, James P.
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Oxford [England] ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2003.
Colección:Point/counterpoint series (Oxford, England)
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Preface One
  • Preface Two
  • Cases
  • SECTION ONE: WHY RACE PREFERENCE IS WRONG AND BAD
  • Prologue: Wrongness and Badness
  • PART I: EQUALITY AND RACE PREFERENCE
  • 1 Equality as a Moral Ideal
  • 2 Affirmative Action
  • 3 Race Preference: The Transformation of Affirmative Action
  • PART II: WHY RACE PREFERENCE IS WRONG
  • 4 Race Preference Is Morally Wrong
  • 5 Race Preference Is Against the Law
  • 6 Race Preference Violates the Constitution
  • PART III: WHY RACE PREFERENCE IS BAD
  • 7 Race Preference Is Bad for the Minorities Preferred.
  • 8 Race Preference Is Bad for the Universities that Give Preference
  • 9 Race Preference Is Bad for Society as a Whole
  • Epilogue: The Future of Race Preference
  • SECTION TWO: DEFENDING AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, DEFENDING PREFERENCES
  • 1 A Legal History of Affirmative Action in the United States
  • 2 A Definition of Affirmative Action
  • 3 A Defense of Outreach Affirmative Action
  • 4 A Defense of Remedial Affirmative Action
  • 5 Remedial Affirmative Action and the U.S. Supreme Court
  • 6 Racial Discrimination v. Sexual Discrimination
  • 7 A Better Standard of Proof for Remedial Affirmative Action.
  • 8 A Defense of Diversity Affirmative Action
  • 9 Objections to Affirmative Action
  • 10 Affirmative Action outside the United States
  • Conclusion
  • SECTION THREE: REPLY TO JAMES P. STERBA
  • SECTION FOUR: REPLY TO CARL COHEN
  • SECTION FIVE: COMMENTS ON THE SUPREME COURT DECISION
  • Bibliography
  • Index
  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y.