Relevance in argumentation /

Mostrar otras versiones (2)

In Relevance in Argumentation, author Douglas Walton presents a new method for critically evaluating arguments for relevance. This method enables a critic to judge whether a move can be said to be relevant or irrelevant, and is based on case studies of argumentation in which a criticism has been mad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Walton, Douglas N.
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Mahwah, N.J. : L. Erlbaum Associates, ©2004.
Temas:
Logic.
Relevance (Philosophy)
Pertinence (Philosophie)
PHILOSOPHY > Logic.
Logic
Logica.
Argumentatie.
Acceso en línea:Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 a 4500
001 EBOOKCENTRAL_ocm53371744
003 OCoLC
005 20240329122006.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 031107s2004 njua ob 001 0 eng d
040 |a N$T  |b eng  |e pn  |c N$T  |d YDXCP  |d OCLCQ  |d EBLCP  |d OCLCQ  |d MHW  |d OCLCQ  |d NTE  |d OCLCE  |d OCLCO  |d E7B  |d REDDC  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCQ  |d SLY  |d OCLCQ  |d SUR  |d LOA  |d COCUF  |d MERUC  |d OCLCQ  |d COO  |d ICG  |d ZCU  |d STF  |d K6U  |d IDK  |d OCLCQ  |d U3W  |d WRM  |d INT  |d VT2  |d OCLCQ  |d WYU  |d DKC  |d AU@  |d OCLCQ  |d UKAHL  |d CEF  |d UX1  |d HS0  |d UWK  |d ADU  |d OCLCQ  |d AGLDB  |d OCLCQ  |d YDX  |d UKEHC  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d CNNOR  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d IOY  |d OCLCQ  |d CAUOI  |d ELBRO  |d OCLCQ  |d SFB  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCL 
019 |a 606988252  |a 646836699  |a 650012330  |a 880335143  |a 961624318  |a 962582906  |a 984871006  |a 999759640  |a 1000457238  |a 1004388852  |a 1007555574  |a 1014078934  |a 1018024834  |a 1037913643  |a 1038691232  |a 1045029847  |a 1053057527  |a 1055364994  |a 1066426171  |a 1081223719  |a 1100459550  |a 1100701888  |a 1101730435  |a 1109122800  |a 1110266276  |a 1112817482  |a 1119032629  |a 1136884377  |a 1137292049  |a 1153011535  |a 1162008072  |a 1200084443  |a 1228541314  |a 1241777655  |a 1250503315  |a 1257361415  |a 1299316601  |a 1321022076  |a 1342051765 
020 |a 1410609448  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 9781410609441  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 9781135618964  |q (e-book) 
020 |a 1135618968 
020 |z 0805847596  |q (c. ;  |q alk. paper) 
020 |z 9780805847598  |q (c. ;  |q alk. paper) 
020 |z 080584760X  |q (pbk. ;  |q alk. paper) 
020 |z 9780805847604  |q (pbk. ;  |q alk. paper) 
035 |a (OCoLC)53371744  |z (OCoLC)606988252  |z (OCoLC)646836699  |z (OCoLC)650012330  |z (OCoLC)880335143  |z (OCoLC)961624318  |z (OCoLC)962582906  |z (OCoLC)984871006  |z (OCoLC)999759640  |z (OCoLC)1000457238  |z (OCoLC)1004388852  |z (OCoLC)1007555574  |z (OCoLC)1014078934  |z (OCoLC)1018024834  |z (OCoLC)1037913643  |z (OCoLC)1038691232  |z (OCoLC)1045029847  |z (OCoLC)1053057527  |z (OCoLC)1055364994  |z (OCoLC)1066426171  |z (OCoLC)1081223719  |z (OCoLC)1100459550  |z (OCoLC)1100701888  |z (OCoLC)1101730435  |z (OCoLC)1109122800  |z (OCoLC)1110266276  |z (OCoLC)1112817482  |z (OCoLC)1119032629  |z (OCoLC)1136884377  |z (OCoLC)1137292049  |z (OCoLC)1153011535  |z (OCoLC)1162008072  |z (OCoLC)1200084443  |z (OCoLC)1228541314  |z (OCoLC)1241777655  |z (OCoLC)1250503315  |z (OCoLC)1257361415  |z (OCoLC)1299316601  |z (OCoLC)1321022076  |z (OCoLC)1342051765 
037 |n Title subscribed to via ProQuest Academic Complete 
042 |a dlr 
050 4 |a BC199.R44  |b W35 2004eb 
072 7 |a PHI  |x 011000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 168  |2 22 
084 |a 08.33  |2 bcl 
084 |a B812. 4  |2 clc 
049 |a UAMI 
100 1 |a Walton, Douglas N. 
245 1 0 |a Relevance in argumentation /  |c Douglas Walton. 
260 |a Mahwah, N.J. :  |b L. Erlbaum Associates,  |c ©2004. 
300 |a 1 online resource (xvi, 311 pages) :  |b illustrations 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a data file 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 289-297) and indexes. 
505 0 0 |t Examples of Irrelevant Arguments --  |t The Exclusionary Function --  |t Irrelevance in a Political Debate --  |t Murder is a Horrible Crime --  |t Problems in Judging an Argument Irrelevant --  |t Material Relevance --  |t Other Fallacies of Irrelevance --  |t Irrelevance in Legal Argumentation --  |t The Straw Man Fallacy --  |t Relevance as Relative to a Discussion --  |t The Dialectical Nature of Relevance --  |t Historical Background --  |t Aristotle on Misconception of Refutation --  |t The Ancient Concept of Stasis --  |t Irrelevance and Digression --  |t William of Sherwood on Ignoratio Elenchi --  |t The Obligation Game --  |t The Port Royal Logic --  |t Isaac Watts's Logick --  |t Whately's Elements of Logic --  |t McCosh on Shifting Ground --  |t The Perspective of Schiller and Sidgwick --  |t Textbook Treatments of Irrelevance --  |t Minimalistic Aristotelian Accounts --  |t Problematic Cases --  |t The Dual Approach --  |t Damer: Further Subtleties of Relevance --  |t Johnson and Blair: Irrelevant Reason and Red Herring --  |t Govier: Probative Relevance --  |t Hurley: Another Variant of the Dual Approach --  |t Straw Man and Relevance --  |t The Current Predicament --  |t The Problem of Analyzing Relevance --  |t The Paradoxes --  |t Relevance and Conditionals --  |t Relevance Logic and Formal Relevance Systems --  |t Appeals to Emotion --  |t Apparent Relevance --  |t Pragmatic Conversational Failures --  |t Conversational Implicature --  |t Problems with the Gricean Approach --  |t Argument Diagramming --  |t Components of a Theory of Relevance --  |t The Dialectical Nature of Relevance --  |t Relevance in a Persuasion Dialogue --  |t Relevance in Information-Seeking Dialogue. 
520 |a In Relevance in Argumentation, author Douglas Walton presents a new method for critically evaluating arguments for relevance. This method enables a critic to judge whether a move can be said to be relevant or irrelevant, and is based on case studies of argumentation in which a criticism has been made that an argument, or part of an argument, is irrelevant. The method is laso based on a new theory of relevance that incorporates techniques of argumentation theory, logic and artificial intelligence. 
506 |3 Use copy  |f Restrictions unspecified  |2 star  |5 MiAaHDL 
533 |a Electronic reproduction.  |b [Place of publication not identified] :  |c HathiTrust Digital Library,  |d 2010.  |5 MiAaHDL 
538 |a Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002.  |u http://purl.oclc.org/DLF/benchrepro0212  |5 MiAaHDL 
583 1 |a digitized  |c 2010  |h HathiTrust Digital Library  |l committed to preserve  |2 pda  |5 MiAaHDL 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
546 |a English. 
590 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b Ebook Central Academic Complete 
590 |a eBooks on EBSCOhost  |b EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide 
650 0 |a Logic. 
650 0 |a Relevance (Philosophy) 
650 6 |a Pertinence (Philosophie) 
650 7 |a PHILOSOPHY  |x Logic.  |2 bisacsh 
650 0 7 |a Relevance (Philosophy)  |2 cct 
650 0 7 |a Logic.  |2 cct 
650 7 |a Logic  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Relevance (Philosophy)  |2 fast 
650 1 7 |a Logica.  |2 gtt 
650 1 7 |a Argumentatie.  |2 gtt 
758 |i has work:  |a Relevance in argumentation (Text)  |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGKXFxHFhkwqmpyfD3K6Dm  |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Walton, Douglas N.  |t Relevance in argumentation.  |d Mahwah, N.J. : L. Erlbaum Associates, ©2004  |z 0805847596  |z 080584760X  |w (DLC) 2003044099  |w (OCoLC)51868164 
856 4 0 |u https://ebookcentral.uam.elogim.com/lib/uam-ebooks/detail.action?docID=474650  |z Texto completo 
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services  |b ASKH  |n AH24583611 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL474650 
938 |a ebrary  |b EBRY  |n ebr10335345 
938 |a EBSCOhost  |b EBSC  |n 99859 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 2347238 
938 |a YBP Library Services  |b YANK  |n 301598458 
938 |a eLibro  |b ELBO  |n ELB156584 
994 |a 92  |b IZTAP 

Ejemplares similares