Cargando…

Without Foundations : Justification in Political Theory /

Can political theorists justify their ideas? Do sound political theories need foundations? What constitutes a well-justified argument in political discourse? Don Herzog attempts to answer these questions by investigating the ways in which major theorists in the Anglo-American political tradition hav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Herzog, Donald J. (Autor)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press, [2018]
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto completo
Texto completo

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000005i 4500
001 DEGRUYTERUP_9781501723001
003 DE-B1597
005 20220629043637.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 220629t20181985nyu fo d z eng d
020 |a 9781501723001 
024 7 |a 10.7591/9781501723001  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-B1597)496534 
035 |a (OCoLC)1042008904 
040 |a DE-B1597  |b eng  |c DE-B1597  |e rda 
041 0 |a eng 
044 |a nyu  |c US-NY 
072 7 |a POL010000  |2 bisacsh 
100 1 |a Herzog, Donald J.,   |e author.  |4 aut  |4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 
245 1 0 |a Without Foundations :  |b Justification in Political Theory /  |c Donald J. Herzog. 
264 1 |a Ithaca, NY :   |b Cornell University Press,   |c [2018] 
264 4 |c ©1985 
300 |a 1 online resource (258 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
505 0 0 |t Frontmatter --   |t CONTENTS --   |t PREFACE --   |t INTRODUCTION --   |t ONE. HOBBES'S PRESCRIPTIVE ARGUMENTS --   |t TWO. LOCKE' S DIVINE POLITICS --   |t THREE. AGAINST UTILITARIANISM --   |t FOUR. THEORY IN CONTEXT: HUME AND SMITH --   |t CONCLUSION --   |t BIBLIOGRAPHY OF WORKS CITED --   |t INDEX 
506 0 |a Open Access  |u https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2  |f unrestricted online access  |2 star 
520 |a Can political theorists justify their ideas? Do sound political theories need foundations? What constitutes a well-justified argument in political discourse? Don Herzog attempts to answer these questions by investigating the ways in which major theorists in the Anglo-American political tradition have justified their views. Making use of a wide range of primary texts, Herzog examines the work of such important theorists as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, the utilitarians (Jeremy Bentham, J. S. Mill. Henry Sidgwick, J. C. Harsanyi, R. M. Hare, and R. B. Brandt), David Hume, and Adam Smith. Herzog argues that Hobbes, Locke, and the utilitarians fail to justify their theories because they try to ground the volatile world of politics in immutable aspects of human nature, language, theology, or rationality. Herzog concludes that the works of Adam Smith and David Hume offer illuminating examples of successful justifications. Basing their political conclusions on social contexts, not on abstract principles, Hume and Smith develop creative solutions to given problems. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. 
540 |a This eBook is made available Open Access under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license:   |u https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0   |u https://degruyter.uam.elogim.com/dg/page/open-access-policy 
546 |a In English. 
588 0 |a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Jun 2022) 
650 0 |a Justification (Theory of knowledge). 
650 0 |a Political science  |x History. 
650 4 |a Philosophy. 
650 4 |a Political Science & Political History. 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / History & Theory.  |2 bisacsh 
773 0 8 |i Title is part of eBook package:  |d De Gruyter  |t Cornell University Press Archive Pre-2000  |z 9783110536171 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.uam.elogim.com/10.7591/9781501723001?locatt=mode:legacy  |7 0  |z Texto completo 
856 4 0 |u https://degruyter.uam.elogim.com/isbn/9781501723001  |7 0  |z Texto completo 
912 |a 978-3-11-053617-1 Cornell University Press Archive Pre-2000  |b 2000 
912 |a GBV-deGruyter-alles 
912 |a ZDB-23-GOA