Restoring the Global Judiciary : Why the Supreme Court Should Rule in U.S. Foreign Affairs /
A historical, international relations, and legal reassessment for why there should be a larger judiciary role in American foreign relationsIn the last several decades, there has been a growing chorus of voices contending that the Supreme Court and federal judiciary should stay out of foreign affairs...
Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
---|---|
Autor principal: | |
Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Princeton, NJ :
Princeton University Press,
[2019]
|
Temas: | |
Acceso en línea: | Texto completo Texto completo |
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a22000005i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DEGRUYTERUP_9780691186122 | ||
003 | DE-B1597 | ||
005 | 20210621102733.0 | ||
006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
008 | 210621t20192019nju fo d z eng d | ||
010 | |a 2019942202 | ||
020 | |a 9780691186122 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/9780691186122 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-B1597)527241 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1105199283 | ||
040 | |a DE-B1597 |b eng |c DE-B1597 |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a nju |c US-NJ | ||
050 | 0 | 0 | |a KF4651 |b .F53 2019 |
050 | 4 | |a KF4651 |b .F53 2020 | |
072 | 7 | |a POL040030 |2 bisacsh | |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 342.730412 |2 23 |
100 | 1 | |a Flaherty, Martin S., |e author. |4 aut |4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Restoring the Global Judiciary : |b Why the Supreme Court Should Rule in U.S. Foreign Affairs / |c Martin S. Flaherty. |
264 | 1 | |a Princeton, NJ : |b Princeton University Press, |c [2019] | |
264 | 4 | |c ©2019 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (344 p.) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
347 | |a text file |b PDF |2 rda | ||
505 | 0 | 0 | |t Frontmatter -- |t Contents -- |t Preface -- |t Part I. Restoring the Global Judiciary -- |t Part II. From Developing Country to Global Power -- |t Part III. Global Imbalance -- |t Part IV. Restoration -- |t Notes -- |t Index |
506 | 0 | |a restricted access |u http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec |f online access with authorization |2 star | |
520 | |a A historical, international relations, and legal reassessment for why there should be a larger judiciary role in American foreign relationsIn the last several decades, there has been a growing chorus of voices contending that the Supreme Court and federal judiciary should stay out of foreign affairs and leave the field to the Congress and president. Challenging this commentary, Restoring the Global Judiciary argues instead for a robust judicial role in the conduct of U.S. foreign policy. With an innovative combination of constitutional history, international relations theory, and legal doctrine, Martin Flaherty demonstrates that the Supreme Court and federal judiciary have the power and duty to apply the law without deference to the other branches.Turning first to the founding of the nation, Flaherty shows that the Constitution's original commitment to separation of powers was as strong in foreign as domestic matters, not least because the document shifted enormous authority to the new federal government. This initial conception eroded as the nation rose from fledgling state to superpower, fueling the growth of a dangerously formidable executive that today asserts near-plenary foreign affairs authority. Flaherty explores how modern international relations makes the commitment to balance all the more critical and he considers implications for modern controversies that the judiciary will continue to confront.At a time when executive and legislative actions in the name of U.S. foreign policy are only increasing, Restoring the Global Judiciary makes the case for a zealous judicial defense of fundamental rights involving global affairs. | ||
538 | |a Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
546 | |a In English. | ||
588 | 0 | |a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 21. Jun 2021) | |
650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / American Government / Judicial Branch. |2 bisacsh | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Title is part of eBook package: |d De Gruyter |t EBOOK PACKAGE COMPLETE 2019 English |z 9783110610765 |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Title is part of eBook package: |d De Gruyter |t EBOOK PACKAGE COMPLETE 2019 |z 9783110664232 |o ZDB-23-DGG |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Title is part of eBook package: |d De Gruyter |t EBOOK PACKAGE Economics, Law & Social Sciences 2019 ENG |z 9783110610130 |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Title is part of eBook package: |d De Gruyter |t EBOOK PACKAGE Social Sciences 2019 |z 9783110606485 |o ZDB-23-DSW |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.uam.elogim.com/10.1515/9780691186122 |z Texto completo |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://degruyter.uam.elogim.com/isbn/9780691186122 |z Texto completo |
912 | |a 978-3-11-061013-0 EBOOK PACKAGE Economics, Law & Social Sciences 2019 ENG |b 2019 | ||
912 | |a 978-3-11-061076-5 EBOOK PACKAGE COMPLETE 2019 English |b 2019 | ||
912 | |a EBA_CL_SN | ||
912 | |a EBA_EBKALL | ||
912 | |a EBA_ECL_SN | ||
912 | |a EBA_EEBKALL | ||
912 | |a EBA_ESSHALL | ||
912 | |a EBA_PPALL | ||
912 | |a EBA_SSHALL | ||
912 | |a EBA_STMALL | ||
912 | |a GBV-deGruyter-alles | ||
912 | |a PDA11SSHE | ||
912 | |a PDA12STME | ||
912 | |a PDA13ENGE | ||
912 | |a PDA17SSHEE | ||
912 | |a PDA5EBK | ||
912 | |a ZDB-23-DGG |b 2019 | ||
912 | |a ZDB-23-DSW |b 2019 |