The Vulnerability Thesis : Interest Group Influence and Institutional Design /
Where politics is dominated by two large parties, as in the United States, politicians should be relatively immune to the influence of small groups. Yet narrow interest groups often win private benefits against majority preferences and at great public expense. Why? The "vulnerability thesis&quo...
Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
---|---|
Autor principal: | |
Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
New Haven, CT :
Yale University Press,
[2012]
|
Temas: | |
Acceso en línea: | Texto completo Texto completo |
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a22000005i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DEGRUYTERUP_9780300167580 | ||
003 | DE-B1597 | ||
005 | 20220524034747.0 | ||
006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
007 | cr || |||||||| | ||
008 | 220524t20122012ctu fo d z eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780300167580 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.12987/9780300167580 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-B1597)485744 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)801411247 | ||
040 | |a DE-B1597 |b eng |c DE-B1597 |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a ctu |c US-CT | ||
050 | 4 | |a JF529 |b .M66 2012 | |
072 | 7 | |a POL043000 |2 bisacsh | |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 322.4/3 |2 23 |
100 | 1 | |a Moosbrugger, Lorelei, |e author. |4 aut |4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Vulnerability Thesis : |b Interest Group Influence and Institutional Design / |c Lorelei Moosbrugger. |
264 | 1 | |a New Haven, CT : |b Yale University Press, |c [2012] | |
264 | 4 | |c ©2012 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (288 p.) : |b 10 b-w | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
347 | |a text file |b PDF |2 rda | ||
506 | 0 | |a restricted access |u http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec |f online access with authorization |2 star | |
520 | |a Where politics is dominated by two large parties, as in the United States, politicians should be relatively immune to the influence of small groups. Yet narrow interest groups often win private benefits against majority preferences and at great public expense. Why? The "vulnerability thesis" is that the electoral system is largely to blame, making politicians in two-party systems more vulnerable to interest group demands than politicians in multiparty systems. Political scientist Lorelei Moosbrugger ranks democracies on a continuum of political vulnerability and tests the thesis by examining agrochemical policy in Austria, Britain, Germany, Sweden, and the European Union. | ||
538 | |a Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. | ||
546 | |a In English. | ||
588 | 0 | |a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 24. Mai 2022) | |
650 | 0 | |a Majorities |v Case studies. | |
650 | 0 | |a Majorities |x Case studies. | |
650 | 0 | |a Majorities. | |
650 | 0 | |a Pressure groups |v Case studies. | |
650 | 0 | |a Pressure groups |x Case studies. | |
650 | 0 | |a Pressure groups. | |
650 | 0 | |a Representative government and representation |v Case studies. | |
650 | 0 | |a Representative government and representation |x Case studies. | |
650 | 0 | |a Representative government and representation. | |
650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Process / Political Advocacy. |2 bisacsh | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Title is part of eBook package: |d De Gruyter |t Yale University Press Backlist eBook-Package 2000-2013 |z 9783110537994 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.uam.elogim.com/10.12987/9780300167580 |z Texto completo |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://degruyter.uam.elogim.com/isbn/9780300167580 |z Texto completo |
912 | |a 978-3-11-053799-4 Yale University Press Backlist eBook-Package 2000-2013 |c 2000 |d 2013 | ||
912 | |a EBA_FAO | ||
912 | |a EBA_UCA_YUP | ||
912 | |a GBV-deGruyter-alles |