Cargando…
Defending Copernicus and Galileo Critical Reasoning in the Two Affairs /
Although recent works on Galileo's trial have reached new heights of erudition, documentation, and sophistication, they often exhibit inflated complexities, neglect 400 years of historiography, or make little effort to learn from Galileo. This book strives to avoid such lacunae by judiciously c...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Autor Corporativo: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Dordrecht :
Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer,
2009.
|
| Edición: | 1st ed. 2009. |
| Colección: | Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science,
280 |
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto Completo |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000005i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 978-90-481-3201-0 | ||
| 003 | DE-He213 | ||
| 005 | 20220115230410.0 | ||
| 007 | cr nn 008mamaa | ||
| 008 | 100301s2009 ne | s |||| 0|eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789048132010 |9 978-90-481-3201-0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/978-90-481-3201-0 |2 doi | |
| 050 | 4 | |a Q174-175.3 | |
| 050 | 4 | |a B67 | |
| 072 | 7 | |a PDA |2 bicssc | |
| 072 | 7 | |a SCI075000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a PDA |2 thema | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 501 |2 23 |
| 100 | 1 | |a Finocchiaro, Maurice A. |e author. |4 aut |4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Defending Copernicus and Galileo |h [electronic resource] : |b Critical Reasoning in the Two Affairs / |c by Maurice A. Finocchiaro. |
| 250 | |a 1st ed. 2009. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Dordrecht : |b Springer Netherlands : |b Imprint: Springer, |c 2009. | |
| 300 | |a XLIII, 350 p. |b online resource. | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 347 | |a text file |b PDF |2 rda | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, |x 2214-7942 ; |v 280 | |
| 505 | 0 | |a Defending Copernicus -- The Geostatic World View -- The Copernican Controversy -- Galileo's Stances Toward Copernican Astronomy -- Galilean Critiques of the Biblical Objection -- Galileo on the Mathematical Physics of Terrestrial Extrusion -- Galilean Rationality in the Copernican Revolution -- Defending Galileo -- The Trial of Galileo, 1613-1633 -- The Galileo Affair, 1633-1992 -- Galileo Right for the Wrong Reasons? -- Galileo as a Bad Theologian? -- Galileo as a Bad Epistemologist? -- Galileo as a Symbol of Science Versus Religion?. | |
| 520 | |a Although recent works on Galileo's trial have reached new heights of erudition, documentation, and sophistication, they often exhibit inflated complexities, neglect 400 years of historiography, or make little effort to learn from Galileo. This book strives to avoid such lacunae by judiciously comparing and contrasting the two Galileo affairs, that is, the original controversy over the earth's motion ending with his condemnation by the Inquisition in 1633, and the subsequent controversy over the rightness of that condemnation continuing to our day. The book argues that the Copernican Revolution required that the hypothesis of the earth's motion be not only constructively supported with new reasons and evidence, but also critically defended from numerous old and new objections. This defense in turn required not only the destructive refutation, but also the appreciative understanding of those objections in all their strength. A major Galilean accomplishment was to elaborate such a reasoned, critical, and fair-minded defense of Copernicanism. Galileo's trial can be interpreted as a series of ecclesiastic attempts to stop him from so defending Copernicus. And an essential thread of the subsequent controversy has been the emergence of many arguments claiming that his condemnation was right, as well as defenses of Galileo from such criticisms. The book's particular yet overarching thesis is that today the proper defense of Galileo can and should have the reasoned, critical, and fair-minded character which his own defense of Copernicus had. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Science-Philosophy. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Science-History. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Religion. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Knowledge, Theory of. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Philosophy-History. | |
| 650 | 1 | 4 | |a Philosophy of Science. |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | |a History of Science. |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | |a Religion. |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | |a Epistemology. |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | |a History of Philosophy. |
| 710 | 2 | |a SpringerLink (Online service) | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Springer Nature eBook | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Printed edition: |z 9789048132027 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Printed edition: |z 9789048132003 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Printed edition: |z 9789400731646 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, |x 2214-7942 ; |v 280 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.uam.elogim.com/10.1007/978-90-481-3201-0 |z Texto Completo |
| 912 | |a ZDB-2-SHU | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-2-SXPR | ||
| 950 | |a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648) | ||
| 950 | |a Philosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725) | ||