Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules /

In Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness, Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels report on their systematic empirical research of the conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. The experimental studies they carried out during more than ten years start from th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autores principales: van Eemeren, Frans H. (Autor), Garssen, Bart (Autor), Meuffels, Bert (Autor)
Autor Corporativo: SpringerLink (Online service)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 2009.
Edición:1st ed. 2009.
Colección:Argumentation Library, 16
Temas:
Language and languages-Philosophy.
Logic.
Philosophy.
Applied linguistics.
Philosophy of Language.
Applied Linguistics.
Acceso en línea:Texto Completo
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Theoretical Background and Organization of the Study
  • Considerations Regarding the Design of the Study
  • Ad Hominem Fallacies: An Exemplary Study
  • The Confrontation Stage: The Freedom Rule
  • The Opening Stage: The Obligation-to-Defend Rule (I)
  • The Opening Stage: The Obligation-to-Defend (II)
  • The Argumentation Stage: The Argument Scheme Rule
  • The Concluding Stage: The Concluding Rule
  • Conventional Validity of the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules.

Ejemplares similares