Cargando…

Law and Politics A Dilemma for Contemporary Legal Theory /

Politics and the political discourse occupy a central position in the modern legal theoretical discussion. The goal of this book is to reconstruct and to classify, according to ideal-typical models, the different positions taken by the major contemporary legal theories as to whether and how law rela...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Zamboni, Mauro (Autor)
Autor Corporativo: SpringerLink (Online service)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg : Imprint: Springer, 2008.
Edición:1st ed. 2008.
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto Completo

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000005i 4500
001 978-3-540-73926-5
003 DE-He213
005 20220116161631.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 100301s2008 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9783540739265  |9 978-3-540-73926-5 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-3-540-73926-5  |2 doi 
050 4 |a K201-487 
050 4 |a K140-165 
072 7 |a LAB  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a LAW079000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAB  |2 thema 
082 0 4 |a 340.1  |2 23 
100 1 |a Zamboni, Mauro.  |e author.  |4 aut  |4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 
245 1 0 |a Law and Politics  |h [electronic resource] :  |b A Dilemma for Contemporary Legal Theory /  |c by Mauro Zamboni. 
250 |a 1st ed. 2008. 
264 1 |a Berlin, Heidelberg :  |b Springer Berlin Heidelberg :  |b Imprint: Springer,  |c 2008. 
300 |a VIII, 166 p.  |b online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
505 0 |a A Methodology of Analysis and Certain Key-concepts -- The Autonomous Model -- The Embedded Model -- The Intersecting Model -- Contemporary Legal Theory and the Dilemma of Law. 
520 |a Politics and the political discourse occupy a central position in the modern legal theoretical discussion. The goal of this book is to reconstruct and to classify, according to ideal-typical models, the different positions taken by the major contemporary legal theories as to whether and how law relates to politics. In particular, attention is focused on Kelsen, Hart, Finnis, Critical Legal Studies, Law and Economics and legal realisms. Though reaching different conclusions, these major legal theories have some common points of departure as to the "law and politics" issue: law and politics tend to keep the features of being two different phenomena as well as of presenting regions of interaction, although with differences as to extent and intensity. Finally, a possible explanation is presented as to why such different legal theories, though often reaching diametric results, somehow must still begin from these common basic points. The explanation for this is found in the specific character of law in the modern state, and the welfare state in particular. 
650 0 |a Law-Philosophy. 
650 0 |a Law-History. 
650 0 |a Law. 
650 0 |a Political science. 
650 1 4 |a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. 
650 2 4 |a Fundamentals of Law. 
650 2 4 |a Philosophy of Law. 
650 2 4 |a Political Science. 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
773 0 |t Springer Nature eBook 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783642093173 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783540841630 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783540739258 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.uam.elogim.com/10.1007/978-3-540-73926-5  |z Texto Completo 
912 |a ZDB-2-SHU 
912 |a ZDB-2-SXLC 
950 |a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648) 
950 |a Law and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)