Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law

During a recent visit to China to give an invited lecture on legal argumentation I was asked a question about conventional opinion in western countries. If legal r- soning is thought to be important by those both inside and outside the legal prof- sion, why does there appear to be so little attentio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Walton, Douglas (Autor)
Autor Corporativo: SpringerLink (Online service)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg : Imprint: Springer, 2005.
Edición:1st ed. 2005.
Temas:
Law > Philosophy.
Law > History.
Logic.
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
Philosophy of Law.
Acceso en línea:Texto Completo

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000005i 4500
001 978-3-540-27881-8
003 DE-He213
005 20230810201211.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 100301s2005 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9783540278818  |9 978-3-540-27881-8 
024 7 |a 10.1007/3-540-27881-8  |2 doi 
050 4 |a K201-487 
050 4 |a K140-165 
072 7 |a LAB  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a LAW079000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LAB  |2 thema 
082 0 4 |a 340.1  |2 23 
100 1 |a Walton, Douglas.  |e author.  |4 aut  |4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 
245 1 0 |a Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law  |h [electronic resource] /  |c by Douglas Walton. 
250 |a 1st ed. 2005. 
264 1 |a Berlin, Heidelberg :  |b Springer Berlin Heidelberg :  |b Imprint: Springer,  |c 2005. 
300 |a XVIII, 270 p.  |b online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
505 0 |a Informal Logic Methods for Law -- Generalizations in Legal Reasoning -- Defeasible Reasoning in Dialogue Systems -- Relevance Determinations of Legal Evidence -- Methods Applied to Problems of Evidence -- Dialectical Explanation in AI -- Argument Invention for Proof Preparation. 
520 |a During a recent visit to China to give an invited lecture on legal argumentation I was asked a question about conventional opinion in western countries. If legal r- soning is thought to be important by those both inside and outside the legal prof- sion, why does there appear to be so little attention given to the study of legal logic? This was a hard question to answer. I had to admit there were no large or well-established centers of legal logic in North America that I could recommend as places to study. Going through customs in Vancouver, the customs officer asked what I had been doing in China. I told him I had been a speaker at a conf- ence. He asked what the conference was on. I told him legal logic. He asked 1 whether there was such a thing. He was trying to be funny, but I thought he had a good point. People will question whether there is such a thing as "legal logic", and some recent very prominent trials give the question some backing in the common opinion. But having thought over the question of why so little attention appears to be given to legal logic as a mainstream subject in western countries, I think I now have an answer. The answer is that we have been looking in the wrong place. 
650 0 |a Law  |x Philosophy. 
650 0 |a Law  |x History. 
650 0 |a Logic. 
650 1 4 |a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. 
650 2 4 |a Logic. 
650 2 4 |a Philosophy of Law. 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
773 0 |t Springer Nature eBook 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783642064326 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783540808596 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9783540251873 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.uam.elogim.com/10.1007/3-540-27881-8  |z Texto Completo 
912 |a ZDB-2-SHU 
912 |a ZDB-2-SXLC 
950 |a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648) 
950 |a Law and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727) 

Ejemplares similares