Cargando…
Bioethics in Law
The idea for Bioethics in Law began more than a decade ago, while I was studying social science and law. I was parti- larly interested in the collaborations that comprised social s- ence in law. Economic and social data in the pioneering Brandeis brief had been used to defend an early 20th-century l...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Autor Corporativo: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Totowa, NJ :
Humana Press : Imprint: Humana,
2007.
|
| Edición: | 1st ed. 2007. |
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto Completo |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000005i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 978-1-59745-295-3 | ||
| 003 | DE-He213 | ||
| 005 | 20220117234710.0 | ||
| 007 | cr nn 008mamaa | ||
| 008 | 100301s2007 xxu| s |||| 0|eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781597452953 |9 978-1-59745-295-3 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/978-1-59745-295-3 |2 doi | |
| 050 | 4 | |a QH332 | |
| 072 | 7 | |a PSAD |2 bicssc | |
| 072 | 7 | |a MED050000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a PSAD |2 thema | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 174.2 |2 23 |
| 100 | 1 | |a Spielman, Bethany. |e author. |4 aut |4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Bioethics in Law |h [electronic resource] / |c by Bethany Spielman. |
| 250 | |a 1st ed. 2007. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Totowa, NJ : |b Humana Press : |b Imprint: Humana, |c 2007. | |
| 300 | |a 186 p. |b online resource. | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 347 | |a text file |b PDF |2 rda | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a How Does Bioethics Help Judicial Reasoning? -- Health Care Ethics Committee Determinations -- Institutional Review Board Determinations -- Bioethics Commission Reports -- Bioethics Scholarship -- Reliability of Bioethics Testimony -- Reliability of Bioethics Testimony -- Reliability of Bioethics Testimony -- Conclusion. | |
| 520 | |a The idea for Bioethics in Law began more than a decade ago, while I was studying social science and law. I was parti- larly interested in the collaborations that comprised social s- ence in law. Economic and social data in the pioneering Brandeis brief had been used to defend an early 20th-century labor law; surveys of consumer confusion had helped resolve trademark - fringement cases; psychologists' predictions of future violence had informed capital sentencing decisions. Additionally, Kenneth Clark's "doll studies," cited by the Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education, had helped change the course of American 1 history. During that time, however, I was most intensely interested in bioethics, a relatively young field whose relationships to law had not been well analyzed. I wondered whether there could or should be a bioethics in law, because bioethics, unlike the social sciences, was not only in its infancy, but also had distinctly normative features, which might not mesh easily with law's own normativity. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Bioethics. | |
| 650 | 1 | 4 | |a Bioethics. |
| 710 | 2 | |a SpringerLink (Online service) | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Springer Nature eBook | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Printed edition: |z 9781603276382 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Printed edition: |z 9781588294340 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.uam.elogim.com/10.1007/978-1-59745-295-3 |z Texto Completo |
| 912 | |a ZDB-2-SME | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-2-SXM | ||
| 950 | |a Medicine (SpringerNature-11650) | ||
| 950 | |a Medicine (R0) (SpringerNature-43714) | ||