Cargando…
Animal Welfare Competing Conceptions And Their Ethical Implications /
Members of the "animal welfare science community", which includes both scientists and philosophers, have illegitimately appropriated the concept of animal welfare by claiming to have given a scientific account of it that is more objectively valid than the more "sentimental" accou...
| Clasificación: | Libro Electrónico |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Autor Corporativo: | |
| Formato: | Electrónico eBook |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Dordrecht :
Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer,
2008.
|
| Edición: | 1st ed. 2008. |
| Temas: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Texto Completo |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- The Science of Laboratory Animal Care and Welfare
- The Roots for the Emerging Science of Animal Welfare in Great Britain
- The Historical Roots of the Science of Laboratory Animal Welfare in the US
- Laboratory Animal Welfare Issues in the US Legislative and Regulatory History
- Mandated Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees
- Do Regulators of Animal Welfare Need to Develop a Theory of Psychological Well-Being?
- Conclusion
- The Emergence of the Science of Food Animal Welfare Mandated by the Brambell Commission Report
- Rollin's Theory of Animal Welfare and Its Ethical Implications
- Duncan and the Inclusion of Subjectivity
- Fraser on Animal Welfare, Science, and Ethics
- Appleby-Sandøe and the Human Welfare Model
- Nordenfelt and Nussbaum on Animal Welfare
- Conclusion to Part II
- Giving Animals What We Owe Them
- to Part III
- The Fair Deal Argument
- A General Theory of Our Moral Obligations to Nonhuman Animals
- Conclusion: Competing Conceptions of Animal Welfare.