Cargando…

Underdetermination An Essay on Evidence and the Limits of Natural Knowledge /

Underdetermination. An Essay on Evidence and the Limits of Natural Knowledge is a wide-ranging study of the thesis that scientific theories are systematically "underdetermined" by the data they account for. This much-debated thesis is a thorn in the side of scientific realists and methodol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Clasificación:Libro Electrónico
Autor principal: Bonk, Thomas (Autor)
Autor Corporativo: SpringerLink (Online service)
Formato: Electrónico eBook
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 2008.
Edición:1st ed. 2008.
Colección:Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, 261
Temas:
Acceso en línea:Texto Completo

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000005i 4500
001 978-1-4020-6899-7
003 DE-He213
005 20220418195837.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 100301s2008 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9781402068997  |9 978-1-4020-6899-7 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-1-4020-6899-7  |2 doi 
050 4 |a Q174-175.3 
050 4 |a B67 
072 7 |a PDA  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a SCI075000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a PDA  |2 thema 
082 0 4 |a 501  |2 23 
100 1 |a Bonk, Thomas.  |e author.  |4 aut  |4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 
245 1 0 |a Underdetermination  |h [electronic resource] :  |b An Essay on Evidence and the Limits of Natural Knowledge /  |c by Thomas Bonk. 
250 |a 1st ed. 2008. 
264 1 |a Dordrecht :  |b Springer Netherlands :  |b Imprint: Springer,  |c 2008. 
300 |a XII, 297 p.  |b online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
490 1 |a Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science,  |x 2214-7942 ;  |v 261 
505 0 |a A Humean Predicament? -- Underdetermination Issues in the Exact Sciences -- Rationality, Method, and Evidence -- Competing Truths -- Problems of Representation -- Underdetermination and Indeterminacy. 
520 |a Underdetermination. An Essay on Evidence and the Limits of Natural Knowledge is a wide-ranging study of the thesis that scientific theories are systematically "underdetermined" by the data they account for. This much-debated thesis is a thorn in the side of scientific realists and methodologists of science alike and of late has been vigorously attacked. After analyzing the epistemological and ontological ascpects of the controversy in detail, and reviewing pertinent logical facts and selected scientific cases, Bonk carefully examines the merits of arguments for and against the thesis. Along the way, he investigates methodological proposals and recent theories of confirmation, which promise to discriminate among observationally equivalent theories on evidential grounds. He explores sympathetically but critically W.V.Quine and H.Putnam's arguments for the thesis, the relationship between indeterminacy and underdetermination, and possibilities for a conventionalist solution. This book is of interest to anyone working in philosophy of science, and to those interested in the philosophy of Quine. 
650 0 |a Science-Philosophy. 
650 1 4 |a Philosophy of Science. 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
773 0 |t Springer Nature eBook 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9789048116393 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9781402068980 
776 0 8 |i Printed edition:  |z 9789402404814 
830 0 |a Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science,  |x 2214-7942 ;  |v 261 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.uam.elogim.com/10.1007/978-1-4020-6899-7  |z Texto Completo 
912 |a ZDB-2-SHU 
912 |a ZDB-2-SXPR 
950 |a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648) 
950 |a Philosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)